PrEP plays a fundamental role in helping to prevent new HIV diagnoses, but is underutilized1,2

PrEP is highly effective for preventing HIV1

According to the CDC, PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) can reduce the chance of contracting HIV from sex by ~99% when taken as prescribed.

After 40 years of progress in reducing new HIV diagnoses, HIV remains a public health focus3

Only

36%

of the 1.2M people indicated for PrEP in 2022

were prescribed a PrEP medication2

(CDC, 2022 US estimates for individuals aged ≥16 years)

Groups most impacted by HIV continue to have low rates of PrEP use

Disparity by:

Black and Latine people

Black/African Americans represent

38%

of new HIV diagnoses4

(CDC, 2023. Estimated HIV diagnoses in the US and 6 territories and free states for individuals aged ≥13 years)

Latine people represent

34%

of new HIV diagnoses4

(CDC, 2023. Estimated HIV diagnoses in the US and 6 territories and free states for individuals aged ≥13 years)

In a retrospective analysis of PrEP prescriptions, Black and Latine people were disproportionately underprescribed PrEP relative to their need for HIV prevention.5

A graph showing the percentage of new HIV diagnoses against the percentage of PrEP usage by race and ethnicity. A graph showing the percentage of new HIV diagnoses against the percentage of PrEP usage by race and ethnicity.

Actor portrayals.

Young people

Young people aged 13-34 accounted for

Young people aged 13-34 accounted for

55%

of new HIV
diagnoses

in 20234

(CDC, 2023. Estimated HIV diagnoses in the US and 6 territories and free states for individuals aged ≥13 years)

2024 data showed that adolescents and young adults had the greatest unmet need for PrEP among all age groups.5

A graph showing the percentage of new HIV diagnoses against the percentage of PrEP usage by age. A graph showing the percentage of new HIV diagnoses against the percentage of PrEP usage by age.


Actor portrayals.

Transgender women (TGW)

A meta-analysis of 98 studies showed:

TGW are 66x

more likely to be living with HIV
vs other individuals (aged >15 years)6

(Stutterheim SE, et al; 2021; N=48,604)

A 2019-2020 study showed low PrEP uptake:

32%

of HIV-negative
TGW

(n=288/902)

were on a PrEP medication7*

(CDC, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance report in 7 US cities)

*Took PrEP at any point in the 12 months before the interview to reduce the risk of getting HIV.7

Despite high awareness of PrEP, many TGW are concerned about PrEP interactions with gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT)7,8

In pharmacokinetic studies, there were

no clinically significant drug interactions impacting the levels of oral PrEP or GAHT when coadministered9-11

Consider BMD when choosing or prescribing PrEP

High prevalence of low bone mass

was observed in studies of TGW prior to/during GAHT, when compared with men as a reference point, according to DHHS12

In a 2020 Italian cross-sectional study that evaluated fracture risk in 57 TGW on estrogen replacement therapy after gender-confirming surgery

1 out of 7

showed an intermediate-high 10-year fracture risk8,13†

†Participants (≥18 years old) were recruited from Turin, Italy, from January 2012 to May 2018.13

Actor portrayals.

Keep groups most impacted by HIV top of mind for HIV prevention conversations.

BMD=bone mineral density; CDC=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; DHHS=US Department of Health and Human Services; GAHT=gender-affirming hormone therapy; Latine=a person of Latin American heritage; MSM=men who have sex with men; TGW=transgender women (who have sex with men).

You may also be interested in: